Breaking the News of this day is represented by Nicușor Dan's statement in Berlin at a press conference on what he will do with Vexler law after CCR rejected his notification, says Master Ion Cristoiu. Video transcription:
I talked about everything that can be video that the CCR decision is an irresponsibility that it has nothing to do with the Constitution with the professionalism of the Constitutional Court because it would be normal for explaining its decision to write at least one page of text, to explain why the law is precise in conditions in which Nicușor Dan said and demonstrated on several pages of the administration.
So, I repeat, I do not know how many times in the Vexler law is neither the toleration of fascism, anti -Semitism nor that it would not need this, but that it is a law made with the bottom of Vexler, with the bottom of Vexler. Please, maybe if there was another bottom, it may be better, closer to the head and this law passed as a goose through the water through the Parliament of Romania and the Commissions and for this the Parliament of Romania should be dismantled because it cannot pass a law.
It is not about the Vexler law, I do not know, the law that condemns anti -Semitism or legionaryism. It is about any law and any law you make must be accurate and as I said about or in the case of anti -Semitism of fascism, legionarism, it must be something quantifiable.
I mean, I do not know, quantifiable in the sense that they went out and marched on the street with the portrait of Zelea Codreanu you cannot tell the cult of Zelea Codreanu. But if I say that Corneliu Zelea Codreanu was killed by the Romanian state led by Carol the second and even assassinated does this mean that I make the cult of Corneliu Zelea Codreanu?
Nicușor Dan answered a question what will do with this law.
Says: "I have attacked it at the Constitutional Court asking the Court to find that about half of the articles in this completion are from the law are unconstitutional
Opinion that I still have even if the Constitutional Court said something else. I still think he has left ambiguity in several articles of this law is harmful to society and makes the tension between the two groups that I have seen in the one-year society to amplify and not to reduce and after the Court will draft the motivation within 10 days I will send it to the Parliament on those articles that I have challenged initially. "
So he will send the law of the Parliament and tell you to modify those articles considered by him unconstitutional. Of course, this consistency of Nicușor Dan is welcomed. I point out that in fact not that association from Făgăraș convinced it, but that some boys came to services and said "let's, sir, try. And so there is a lot of tension in society with these measures, now we increase tension and on some social dangers." But what does this stubborn of Nicușor Dan tell me? He says what I say and I still believe in the election campaign. Nicușor Dan as I know him will be restless for all the stabs including for Bolojan, that he does not give back.
So if he came to his head that this law is unconstitutional ... if you notice another example, it's like VAT. If he entered his head and said that the VAT should not grow, say this to the execution platoon. So with the law. So all these, I do not know, all his enemies, or everyone who works, must know that Nicușor Dan does not have the instinct of Primeșdia when something enters his head.
So another would have said "yes, sir, that's it - said CCR, I have nothing to do." Not! So God will keep you from entering him in his head. Ready, like that with the VAT have you seen? And to this law, as well. So with this law, the alarm signal for all those who collaborate from the Government, from the parties, is that he does not give back once something entered.
Video at Mediafax
